An investigation record that holds together
The incident workspace brings reporting, preliminary causes and actions, RCA, the event timeline, and closeout into a coherent record. Evidence remains available for review as the workflow advances.
The buyer problem
Keep the context through the handoff.
A report can be complete while the response is still fragmented. Investigators retain one set of notes, maintenance receives a separate request, and training changes live in another tracker. When someone asks whether the response worked, the evidence is difficult to reconstruct.
- Capture and reviewRecord the incident, location, people, severity, and supporting evidence.
- Investigate the systemPreserve findings and document the RCA method, conclusion, and review.
- Assign corrective workConnect actions to the incident or conclusion, with owner, due date, and verification criteria.
- Coordinate executionBring maintenance, procedure changes, and training into the response.
- Review effectivenessRecord the outcome of the review and decide whether more work is needed.
Workflow depth
What the platform brings together.
Explore the record, the decision, and the work that follows it.
Actions with context and accountability
Corrective actions can carry source identity, ownership, dates, classification, updates, and evidence. Related work can be followed from the incident instead of reconstructed from separate trackers.
A separate effectiveness judgment
Schedule review windows and record whether an action was effective, partially effective, ineffective, or could not be determined. A failed review can lead to follow-up corrective work.
Recordkeeping support alongside the workflow
Maintain OSHA-relevant case information and supported recordkeeping outputs. Your organization makes the recordability and legal decisions; the app helps maintain the underlying record.
Illustrative workflow
A concrete operating scenario.
A conveyor injury exposes a guarding gap. The RCA identifies the failed control; corrective work coordinates the guard repair; procedure and training changes address the revised task. Later review records the evidence considered and whether the response was effective.
Connected inputs and outputs
Inputs include incident reports, evidence, people and location context, investigation findings, and RCA conclusions. Outputs include owned corrective work, related operational changes, closeout records, recordkeeping outputs, and effectiveness history.
Configuration and fit
Confirm the boundaries before rollout.
Workflow states, required evidence, approval rules, access, and review cadence depend on configuration. An effectiveness review records a professional judgment; it does not guarantee prevention or compliance.
Make the next step concrete
Evaluate the whole workflow.
Use a sample workspace to follow the connections, or bring a representative process to a walkthrough.